<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe AIR Runtime Font Differences</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thanksmister.com/index.php/archive/adobe-air-runtime-font-differences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thanksmister.com/index.php/archive/adobe-air-runtime-font-differences/</link>
	<description>Flash &#38; Flex Developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 04:17:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister</title>
		<link>http://www.thanksmister.com/index.php/archive/adobe-air-runtime-font-differences/#comment-11405</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 01:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thanksmister.com/?p=355#comment-11405</guid>
		<description>@Peter deHaan I think your solution works for displaying the applications on the PC, they all look the same. But when displayed on the Mac, two of the applications still show the same font differences as before, even though two of the applications were generated on Windows with cleartype on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Peter deHaan I think your solution works for displaying the applications on the PC, they all look the same. But when displayed on the Mac, two of the applications still show the same font differences as before, even though two of the applications were generated on Windows with cleartype on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister</title>
		<link>http://www.thanksmister.com/index.php/archive/adobe-air-runtime-font-differences/#comment-11377</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 21:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thanksmister.com/?p=355#comment-11377</guid>
		<description>@Peter Stromberg

I viewed all three applications simultaneously on both a Windows machine and a Mac machine in different positions, there was no difference when moving the applications to different window positions.  I believe that there is something different when creating an AIR file on certain machines as opposed to others.  The question then is, what is significant about the environment of the computer/os of the machine that produced the middle image?   When I described the text as &quot;crap&quot;, I was talking more about the text on the buttons and the italic text, this is the area of the most significant readability issues.  My hypothesis was that creating an AIR file on three different machines, and then running those AIR files on a single machine would show that it was in fact the machine that produced the AIR file that somehow caused the display differences.  It does not matter which machine you run the three files on, you always get the same results.  Something about the Windows XP Pro machine produced different fonts than the AIR files created on the other two machines.   It is as if the AIR file is being &quot;injected&quot; with some quality by the Windows XP Pro machine that is not happening with the other two machines.    

My other theory is that there is some element of the Flex Properties that is different from machine to machine, but I just don&#039;t know what it is.   My other thought was that some how the application is scaling the fonts slightly, causing the effect on the fonts.  I say this because we just checked out the code with the .flexProperties file already attached, rather than create a new Flex project and just adding the class files.   I will test this soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Peter Stromberg</p>
<p>I viewed all three applications simultaneously on both a Windows machine and a Mac machine in different positions, there was no difference when moving the applications to different window positions.  I believe that there is something different when creating an AIR file on certain machines as opposed to others.  The question then is, what is significant about the environment of the computer/os of the machine that produced the middle image?   When I described the text as &#8220;crap&#8221;, I was talking more about the text on the buttons and the italic text, this is the area of the most significant readability issues.  My hypothesis was that creating an AIR file on three different machines, and then running those AIR files on a single machine would show that it was in fact the machine that produced the AIR file that somehow caused the display differences.  It does not matter which machine you run the three files on, you always get the same results.  Something about the Windows XP Pro machine produced different fonts than the AIR files created on the other two machines.   It is as if the AIR file is being &#8220;injected&#8221; with some quality by the Windows XP Pro machine that is not happening with the other two machines.    </p>
<p>My other theory is that there is some element of the Flex Properties that is different from machine to machine, but I just don&#8217;t know what it is.   My other thought was that some how the application is scaling the fonts slightly, causing the effect on the fonts.  I say this because we just checked out the code with the .flexProperties file already attached, rather than create a new Flex project and just adding the class files.   I will test this soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister</title>
		<link>http://www.thanksmister.com/index.php/archive/adobe-air-runtime-font-differences/#comment-11376</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 21:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thanksmister.com/?p=355#comment-11376</guid>
		<description>@ Peter

Remember that I viewed all three applications on both Windows and Mac at the same time, meaning I had all three applications running at the same time on each test machine side-by-side.  There should be no difference in the fonts displayed for the applications.    If you are saying that having &quot;ClearType&quot; enabled on the machine that creates the AIR runtime package, then this is still whacked.  It would mean that you always have to create the runtime on a Windows machine to produce a higher quality AIR runtime application.  This seems to be counter-intuitive to the purpose of AIR, which is to have the same application run on multiple operating systems without any difference in the application.    I can&#039;t imagine always having to do my work on my Mac, then run over to my Windows machine and compile my runtime to achieve optimum results.  Of course I would have to be sure I have at least one machine that produces the clear fonts because one version was created on another Windows machine and still the fonts are different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Peter</p>
<p>Remember that I viewed all three applications on both Windows and Mac at the same time, meaning I had all three applications running at the same time on each test machine side-by-side.  There should be no difference in the fonts displayed for the applications.    If you are saying that having &#8220;ClearType&#8221; enabled on the machine that creates the AIR runtime package, then this is still whacked.  It would mean that you always have to create the runtime on a Windows machine to produce a higher quality AIR runtime application.  This seems to be counter-intuitive to the purpose of AIR, which is to have the same application run on multiple operating systems without any difference in the application.    I can&#8217;t imagine always having to do my work on my Mac, then run over to my Windows machine and compile my runtime to achieve optimum results.  Of course I would have to be sure I have at least one machine that produces the clear fonts because one version was created on another Windows machine and still the fonts are different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Strømberg</title>
		<link>http://www.thanksmister.com/index.php/archive/adobe-air-runtime-font-differences/#comment-11374</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Strømberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 18:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thanksmister.com/?p=355#comment-11374</guid>
		<description>You dont&#039;t think this could have anything to do with window position, i.e, if the window is on a half pixel, the anti-aliasing is different? Could try pixel snapping it you havn&#039;t already. 

For the record I don&#039;t see any significant difference in the screen shots, apart from a missing tab on the Windows XP, and the tab text is slightly thicker on the middle example (actually prefer the others, the middle one looks like it&#039;s got glow on). I certainly wouldn&#039;t descibe any as &quot;crap&quot;. Maybe a screenshot dosn&#039;t show the problem correctly, as it is a bitmap being interpreted by our graphic cards, not a font. You might consider posting a small test app for people to try and post feedback?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You dont&#8217;t think this could have anything to do with window position, i.e, if the window is on a half pixel, the anti-aliasing is different? Could try pixel snapping it you havn&#8217;t already. </p>
<p>For the record I don&#8217;t see any significant difference in the screen shots, apart from a missing tab on the Windows XP, and the tab text is slightly thicker on the middle example (actually prefer the others, the middle one looks like it&#8217;s got glow on). I certainly wouldn&#8217;t descibe any as &#8220;crap&#8221;. Maybe a screenshot dosn&#8217;t show the problem correctly, as it is a bitmap being interpreted by our graphic cards, not a font. You might consider posting a small test app for people to try and post feedback?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter deHaan</title>
		<link>http://www.thanksmister.com/index.php/archive/adobe-air-runtime-font-differences/#comment-11366</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter deHaan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 04:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thanksmister.com/?p=355#comment-11366</guid>
		<description>For the two Windows machines, try comparing the ClearType settings and see if one has it enabled and the other doesn&#039;t, or see if they have different settings.

Display Properties -&gt; Appearance tab -&gt; Effects -&gt; &quot;Use the following method to smooth edges of screen fonts:&quot;.

I have mine deselected, but one machine may have it set to &quot;Standard&quot; or &quot;ClearType&quot;, or whatever.

Peter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the two Windows machines, try comparing the ClearType settings and see if one has it enabled and the other doesn&#8217;t, or see if they have different settings.</p>
<p>Display Properties -&gt; Appearance tab -&gt; Effects -&gt; &#8220;Use the following method to smooth edges of screen fonts:&#8221;.</p>
<p>I have mine deselected, but one machine may have it set to &#8220;Standard&#8221; or &#8220;ClearType&#8221;, or whatever.</p>
<p>Peter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r4vi (Ravi K)</title>
		<link>http://www.thanksmister.com/index.php/archive/adobe-air-runtime-font-differences/#comment-12920</link>
		<dc:creator>r4vi (Ravi K)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 06:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thanksmister.com/?p=355#comment-12920</guid>
		<description>&lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://twitter.com/diveintomark&quot;&gt;@diveintomark&lt;/a&gt; yep adoble fail @ fonts in air fontscheck this: http://thanksmister.com/?p=355</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/diveintomark">@diveintomark</a> yep adoble fail @ fonts in air fontscheck this: <a href="http://thanksmister.com/?p=355" rel="nofollow">http://thanksmister.com/?p=355</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
